For my reflection, I chose the three chapters from Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. I was both fascinated and terrified at the same time. Since becoming an educator nearly 19 years ago, I’ve always been fascinated with the ways which technology can be used in the classroom. In all honesty, I have used it haphazardly at times, not truly understanding whether it would have a positive impact or not. There was definitely a lot of reflective journal writing based on my, often times, experimental use of technology with my learners. Since I had a background in engineering, I would notice a perceived problem and attempt to rectify it…with limited experience, mind you. Even before I had education in language education, it seemed my experience in science had given me the tools for the “cyclical” process of reflection in the classroom, a vital characteristic of improvement. As stated in Chapter 1 of Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary, “Reflective practitioners consider the problems in their environments (e.g., a learning problem of their students) and attempt to resolve the problems by changes in practice, based upon both research results and professional experience. Reflection on this process leads to changes in the considered solution and further attempts to identify and solve problems in the environment, a cyclical process of practice/ reflection that can lead to improved practice (Schön, 1990).” Januszewski & Molenda (2008)
After reading these three chapters, reflective practice appears to be an underlying theme in the field of IT. From the very beginning of the field, there has been constant change and improvement in the field, in the definition of IT, but also in ISD. It’s fascinating how the use of technology in the field has morphed through what I had experienced in my early school years. My has A/V changed! While reading, I recalled my days in elementary school watching reel-to-reel instructional films on the classroom film projector, and in middle school when the teacher would send a friend and me to go to the A/V Center and bring back the TV and VCR she had reserved. I also remember crashing into the walls a couple of times rolling that equipment through the halls…those TV carts were heavy! Little did I realize then the behind-the-scenes efforts to get to that point where we were using these instructional videos in the classroom supplementing the lessons the teacher had spent hours, perhaps days, preparing.
It was also fascinating reading about how the educational technology has evolved from the silent films of the early 1900s to the huge paradigm shift after World War II when, in my opinion, the concept of IT and “instructional films” really began to take shape as stated in Chapter 4, “…the US army commissioned a series of psychological studies, later published as Experiments on Mass Communication which rigorously tested hypothesis about various filmic techniques and their instructional effectiveness. The hypothesis mainly revolved around issues prominent in the Gestalt and cognitive psychology of the time: providing an introduction to provide a mental set for comprehending and remembering the films message; pacing the presentation to suit the audiences cognitive ability; choosing words and images to illustrate points as clearly as possible; controlling the density of visual and aural messages for comprehension; avoiding distracting cues; and using repetition and summaries to enhance retention. Because of the concentration of time, money, effort, and research expended on these productions, a genre of instructional film came into its own.” Molenda & Boling (2008) It was certainly interesting to learn of the efforts and research to determine what makes an instructional film…well…educational.
Clown by Richard Balducci 1968, Presented by Learning Corporation of America
Though fascinating as it was to learn of the evolution of IT, at least, through the complex process involved in the creation and systems design, I was terrified at the prospect of the working through the process. Initially, I was overwhelmed and am still left with the thoughts of how to begin such an endeavor. It terrifies me that the rapid advancement of technology and digital tools will only make our designs much more difficult and complex as was stated in Chapter 4, “Advances in technology have not made planning and producing easier, but more difficult and more labor intensive, with each hour of interactive multimedia instruction requiring 300 person hours of development time.” Molenda and Boling (2008)
However,
though terrifying and flawed as it may seem to some due to being “too slow and
clumsy”, according to Zemke and Rossett, 2002, there is no alternative to ISD at
present. Molenda and Boling (2008)
Needless to say, I’m all in!
References
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Chapter 1: Definition. In Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary (pp. 1-14). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Molenda, M.,
& Boling, E. (2008). Chapter 4: Creating. In Educational
Technology: A Definition with Commentary (pp. 81-139). New York:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


